Cadillac CTS-V Forum banner
21 - 40 of 139 Posts
Getting blue balls!
 
Discussion starter · #23 · (Edited)
Taking 4% more fuel give or take...

Next time I'll live stream, and you can be bored out of your minds. Been here 7 hours now having dyno difficulty...

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
Blue balls...lolololol
 
What??? NO HAPPY ENDING YET?!?!?!

Also, why so much oil in the case? You're still running a can, aren't you?
 
Just a couple of comments:

It takes approximately 1.5 cfm to generate 1.0 Hp.
So to make more HP one needs to feed more air
to the engine so that one can add more fuel and
therefore increase the 'Mass Charge'.

If the 'Peak' torque increases at about the same RPM as logged
with the 'Base Line' test, then the Dynamic Compression Ratio
which is equal to the Trapped Compression ratio + Volumetric Efficiency
has been increased / improved at that RPM.

With the above in mind;
The Dynamic Compression Ratio will then be increased 'Only' at those
RPM points where the Torque has been Increased.

The above statement then makes a point that the DCR can be 'Higher'
than the Static / Geometric compression ratio when Volumetric Efficiency
is added into the equation.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Random,
You do a great job helping to quantify modifications and I believe you should be
promoted to 'Head Beta Tester' for this site--:cool:

Cheers,
The Duck
 
Discussion starter · #29 · (Edited)
Cliff notes: 2% total fuel with 11.5 AFR.
+23 / 16 from this morning with the worst dyno conditions (90 degrees and very humid) - so I'll say that's the minimum gains to expect!

I could not add any timing. Just fuel. Pics and graphs etc all coming.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
That's not bad all things considered. I think most claim 30hp?
 
Your air conditions changed pretty dramatically. I think 30/20 ish is a safe assumption. Awesome job on getting this done. I also think as you add more power/mods it has a greater effect much like 2" primaries.
 
If it's sae to sae corrected temps shouldn't matter

Now heat soak would be more critical, if iat2's were similar, that's as close as you can get for a comparison and let sae correction deal with atmosphere.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Got Bearings?
If it's sae to sae corrected temps shouldn't matter

Now heat soak would be more critical, if iat2's were similar, that's as close as you can get for a comparison and let sae correction deal with atmosphere.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That is not true. SAE cannot correct for everything. I have seen almost 20rwhp differences from SAE winter to SAE summer with no changes to the setup.
 
Cliff notes: 2% total fuel with 11.5 AFR.
+23 / 16 from this morning with the worst dyno conditions (90 degrees and very humid) - so I'll say that's the minimum gains to expect!

I could not add any timing. Just fuel. Pics and graphs etc all coming.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
You had me so excited too. At least you have a running car.:(
 
That is not true. SAE cannot correct for everything. I have seen almost 20rwhp differences from SAE winter to SAE summer with no changes to the setup.
Agree but it's the best control you can ask for on same day


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
21 - 40 of 139 Posts