Cadillac CTS-V Forum banner
41 - 60 of 139 Posts
Discussion starter · #41 · (Edited)
IAT2S started over 100 every run as ambient was 90.

I will speculate as to the gains - on a cooler day I think it would be 30+. The blower was ported in the runners for ported heads - creating a small step at the entrance of the cylinder head intake port. Had this been seamless, it might have picked up a few ponies.

IMHO I think expecting 30 RWHP on a typical build is very reasonable - I do think today was one of the WORST opportunities for a back to back... and it still gained over 20 RWHP with an 87mm throttle body!



Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
For the record density altitude was within 550 feet between baseline in the am and ported blower in the afternoon, and was lower on the afternoon pull
2579 feet at 10am
2026 feet at 5:30pm

Sae correction should handle the DA swing of 550 feet.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Given the conditions that's not bad, wonder how much a ported tb and 4.5 inch intake and a cool day , I don't think 30-40 hp is out of the question. Thanks for setting this up
 
You guys need to take into consideration pulley combo. As pulley size increases the blower rpms increase. Based on my testing of this platform I guessed low end 14 and high end 16 psi is where porting would start to show its gains. Being we picked up 23-16 at just 14.5 psi. It's safe to say bigger gains can be had from a port with more pulley.

I still have testing to do.

If someone is game for a before and after Dyno I can set up another test price for someone.

Just because this tested well it don't mean I'm done with your guys blowers there is always room for improvement


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You guys need to take into consideration pulley combo. As pulley size increases the blower rpms increase. Based on my testing of this platform I guessed low end 14 and high end 16 psi is where porting would start to show its gains. Being we picked up 23-16 at just 14.5 psi. It's safe to say bigger gains can be had from a port with more pulley.

I still have testing to do.

If someone is game for a before and after Dyno I can set up another test price for someone.

Just because this tested well it don't mean I'm done with your guys blowers there is always room for improvement


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I might be down for that. I'm running a 2.4/9.1 combo with stock manifolds, so I'm on the high side of boost. PM me your pricing (and I'm military as well if that changes anything).
 
That is not true. SAE cannot correct for everything. I have seen almost 20rwhp differences from SAE winter to SAE summer with no changes to the setup.
Exactly...My experience is that sae corrected is misleading. If you don't perform the dyno under the same conditions don't expect to see comparable numbers. I've seen 35whp difference in dyno runs due to different atmospheric conditions.

Atmospheric conditions have a significant impact whether at the strip or dyno....done
 
Discussion starter · #49 ·
Can we see the overlay graph of the before and after?
Now in original post, will post screen shots of the dyno run also.

I think everyone was secretly hoping for +40 - so they could dismiss headers and save a few bucks!

But, that's the double-edged sword of dyno testing - and from a guy who isn't making as much dyno numbers today as I did back in march. [emoji2]

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
Now in original post, will post screen shots of the dyno run also.

I think everyone was secretly hoping for +40 - so they could dismiss headers and save a few bucks!

But, that's the double-edged sword of dyno testing - and from a guy who isn't making as much dyno numbers today as I did back in march. [emoji2]

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
IMO those are great gains with nothing being opened up past the stock 87mm TB in nasty conditions. I nailed the HP guess but I expected a slightly higher torque bump from the initial hit as I expected a little added boost. Can't win them all... You obviously know your next step with heads and 102mm stuff, to pick up the power you did with more room to pulley, small cam, stock heads and stock TB size IMO shows the porting works and more of a real world number for the majority to expect when not going 102mm or touching the top end components other than valve springs in stock heads.

Brett gains some credibility in my books and still knows he has room to improve some things.
 
Discussion starter · #51 ·
Agreed. Legit numbers and willingness to experiment for better gains is the sign of a craftsman. Boasting about "expected" gains but never showing real proof is the sign of a salesman.

This test also suggests the biggest gains are in the snout and case transition as Brett and others mentioned. Hogging out the runners (such as this and to a greater extent formato) is probably negligible to outright counterproductive on stock heads.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
Agreed. Legit numbers and willingness to experiment for better gains is the sign of a craftsman. Boasting about "expected" gains but never showing real proof is the sign of a salesman.

This test also suggests the biggest gains are in the snout and case transition as Brett and others mentioned. Hogging out the runners (such as this and to a greater extent formato) is probably negligible to outright counterproductive on stock heads.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
That's my next test intake runners not being ported

Need a before and after on that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I have done before and after a in summer and in winter. My before and after netted 25 hp in the summer. Same truck in the winter same two blower same time netted 42 hp. Air density and air temp and humidity have a huge aspect on the Dyno. I picked up 17 hp in 6 months on the Dyno with the same blower.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
IMO those are great gains with nothing being opened up past the stock 87mm TB in nasty conditions. I nailed the HP guess but I expected a slightly higher torque bump from the initial hit as I expected a little added boost. Can't win them all... You obviously know your next step with heads and 102mm stuff, to pick up the power you did with more room to pulley, small cam, stock heads and stock TB size IMO shows the porting works and more of a real world number for the majority to expect when not going 102mm or touching the top end components other than valve springs in stock heads.

Brett gains some credibility in my books and still knows he has room to improve some things.
Now I just need to experiment with the case while backing my product. If you guys are willing to experiment the price will reflect that. If you want a full out port I would expect well the port I gave random for his tests.

But there are parts I want to see results from if they do or don't add benefits to a port.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Discussion starter · #55 ·
I personally think before/after tests need headers. Running on stock exhaust manifolds is one BFV (big fucking variable) that detracts from the subtleties of what you're testing.

However... I am tempted to have you port my original blower, leaving the intake runners port-matched for the heads and seeing if anything changes! I suspect the difference would be within the margin of error on a dyno run, but it's something I'm pondering about. I'd just need to sell off this existing ported S/C to recoupe my costs and dyno time.
 
Now I just need to experiment with the case while backing my product. If you guys are willing to experiment the price will reflect that. If you want a full out port I would expect well the port I gave random for his tests.

But there are parts I want to see results from if they do or don't add benefits to a port.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've already posted that I'm interested. Just waiting to get a PM from you on the details.

And I was number two on the guess for the gains. Number one guy turned down the prize.
 
Military discount and and prize money

Your making out like a bandit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Haha just make Random pay the prize money lol
 
Discussion starter · #59 ·
With how this turned out, maybe I should be asking for a refund! :eek:



Image
 
41 - 60 of 139 Posts