Cadillac CTS-V Forum banner
81 - 100 of 250 Posts
The problem I have with the Blackwing engine is that now it went from easy to work on engine up to European-complicated and labor intensive. To work on the heads now the turbos and all the plumbing need to come off as well as the front of the engine to access the DOHC cam chains to remove them just to pull the heads, and now the cams need to be removed also. Now to replace the head gaskets it'll cost $10,000 just like BMW's and Merc's, not $3,000-4,000 like it is on an LS engine. A lot of people say that GM's engines are behind the times with only running 2 valves per cylinder, but yet they put out just as much power or even more than the other "technologically" advanced engines. Yes, the turbo engine can be tweaked with a few computer mods of allowing more boost and adjusting the spark and fuel curve, but on the repair and parts modification end, an engine like this is a real pain to work on in the car. If this was such a good design why didn't Cadillac continue to upgrade the Northstar engine?
$3k-4K to do head gaskets in an LS?

My turbo DOHC Subaru was $1000 parts and labor to replace the head gaskets, ARP head studs and timing belt and water pump lol

The LS sounds expensive to work on! Haha



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I would not want to own the 1st iteration of this motor especially in light of the Northstar disappointment. Dodge had a proven Hemi when they supercharged it and so far has been reliable. This is a Cadillac designed motor from the ground up. I hope by the time it makes it into the CT5-V, the motor will be proven and upped to 800 HP.
 
A twin turbo engine does nothing for me. I bought a 2019 knowing this would be the last year of the LT4 in the V. The lack of FI noise, on demand torque, and overall drama that a turbo brings to the table is a deal breaker. I love the supercharger whine and the instant torque of the LT4. I drove the M5 before buying the V and the performance left me unimpressed and bored. I do wish I had the A10 though.
 
I would not want to own the 1st iteration of this motor especially in light of the Northstar disappointment. Dodge had a proven Hemi when they supercharged it and so far has been reliable. This is a Cadillac designed motor from the ground up. I hope by the time it makes it into the CT5-V, the motor will be proven and upped to 800 HP.
Northstar disappointment? Cadillac used that engine for 19 years and even supercharged it!
 
I had the 4.4L SC Northstar in my 2006 STS-V. Great engine. However, the NA 4.6L Northstar in the STS & DTS models from first release through 2006 all had head gasket issues. ALL.
 
Three NA 4.6L? I had 2, and it happened to both. One was a 98 STS and did it at around 60k.
 
Northstar was the last Cadillac produced engine. They ran the defective Northstar 4.6L almost 10 years. GM’s pushrod engines are much better, though, you’re right.
 
A twin turbo engine does nothing for me. I bought a 2019 knowing this would be the last year of the LT4 in the V. The lack of FI noise, on demand torque, and overall drama that a turbo brings to the table is a deal breaker. I love the supercharger whine and the instant torque of the LT4. I drove the M5 before buying the V and the performance left me unimpressed and bored. I do wish I had the A10 though.
Same here...I was unimpressed with the M5 and the E63 AMG is truly frumly looking, too much old style Asian car for my taste and too baroque inside.
I do not particularly like the CT6, it is a luxo barge and a bit too "Audiesque" for my taste.....I do not like cars with a third lateral window.

I'm glad I got the CTS-V
 
So I have been quietly following the CT6-V; seeing the press release for 275 units to be preordered and then being instantly sold doesn't entirely surprise me but I'm also disappointed in Cadillac's refusal to put any marketing dollars behind the car. I mean, I get it, but c'mon.

At any rate I reached out to one of the individuals on the PRs and on a lark asked for the order guide, and to my surprise near-instantly received a response. Here's a link to the site (note it's on GM's fleet site) - and then below I have pulled down and re-hosted a PDF of the order guide itself in case it becomes unavailable on the site:

https://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/N...regionID=1&divisionID=5&type=0&vehicleID=21700&section=modelhome&page=&butID=1#

https://www.dropbox.com/s/q9bpvr3wuj8cp2p/2019-01-17 2019 CT6-V printbook.pdf?dl=1

A few comments of my own;

245/40/20 tires seem narrow given the drivetrain... I wonder if this thing will be difficult to stuff big rubber under.

Blackwing engine RPO appears to be "LTA" although I suspect this is already known somewhere

Two RPO codes for the suspension, FE3 (which I dimly remember from my G8 GXP days?) is the "sport" code GM likes to use on many models, but it appears they're also using F55 for the MR shocks

Looks like 5 exterior colors (white, gray?, Black, Metallic Black, and deep red) - all of which aside from black have an extra cost - and a choice of either black or "dark auburn" interior

4470 lb quoted curb weight, 5523 GVWR, which for those of us keeping track means the CT6-V has a higher load carrying capacity than a 2019 RAM 1500 Limited Crew Cab.
 
AWD negates the need for wide tires at stock power levels and helps with CAFE requirements. And you should've kept the Pee.
Hard disagree, 245s are insufficient for good lateral grip in a car that heavy and large. To wit, the W212 E63s at right around the same curb weight runs around with 255/35/19 front and 285/30/19 rear, not unlike the 2nd gen V, and the 2018+ model (W213) runs 265/35/20 front and 295/30/20 rear. Even the Audi S7 - less power and heavier - runs a squared 265/35/20 - the new AWD BMW M5 runs 275 fronts and 285 rears, etc.

At this point in the game I assure you that Cadillac does not know something these other successful manufacturers don't. This is just lazy parts-binning.

Last, re: Pee, what?
 
Keep in mind the CT6V is not the next gen V4.

CT5-V is the CTSV 3 next gen.

The CT6V is its own vehicle and more like the V sport variant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The CT6V is its own vehicle and more like the V sport variant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Right, as I suspect we all know mid-2018 Cadillac called an audible and instead of having the base trims, V-Sport, and -V variants, they took the exact car that was going to be the V-Sport and simply renamed it as the -V.

So all commentary aside, in 2016 C&D tested a AWD CT6 on the same size tires and it pulled 0.86g. Consider that that's worse than their long-term Chrysler Pacifica minivan that pulled 0.87g on all-seasons.

Is that V-Sport territory? Sure, I guess so? The 2018 XTS V-Sport pulled 0.82g on the same skidpad.

Is it -V territory? No. C&D's 2019 CTS-V pulled 1.01g, MT tested the ATS-V coupe and sedan at 1.04g and 1.03g respectively, and even C&D's long-term 2014 CTS V-Sport finished (after 40k miles) at 0.95g.

So let's not be apologists for Cadillac re-labeling mid-tier products as top-shelf and phoning in the configuration for the CT6-'V' with a six-figure opportunity cost attached to it.
 
WTH?? 4470 pounds? Is the AWD system made out of granite? A stock CT6 is LIGHTER than a stock CTS. How did the CT6-V gain so much weight?

So I have been quietly following the CT6-V; seeing the press release for 275 units to be preordered and then being instantly sold doesn't entirely surprise me but I'm also disappointed in Cadillac's refusal to put any marketing dollars behind the car. I mean, I get it, but c'mon.

At any rate I reached out to one of the individuals on the PRs and on a lark asked for the order guide, and to my surprise near-instantly received a response. Here's a link to the site (note it's on GM's fleet site) - and then below I have pulled down and re-hosted a PDF of the order guide itself in case it becomes unavailable on the site:

https://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/N...r=2019®ionID=1&divisionID=5&type=0&vehicleID=21700§ion=modelhome&page=&butID=1#

https://www.dropbox.com/s/q9bpvr3wuj8cp2p/2019-01-17 2019 CT6-V printbook.pdf?dl=1

A few comments of my own;

245/40/20 tires seem narrow given the drivetrain... I wonder if this thing will be difficult to stuff big rubber under.

Blackwing engine RPO appears to be "LTA" although I suspect this is already known somewhere

Two RPO codes for the suspension, FE3 (which I dimly remember from my G8 GXP days?) is the "sport" code GM likes to use on many models, but it appears they're also using F55 for the MR shocks




Looks like 5 exterior colors (white, gray?, Black, Metallic Black, and deep red) - all of which aside from black have an extra cost - and a choice of either black or "dark auburn" interior

4470 lb quoted curb weight, 5523 GVWR, which for those of us keeping track means the CT6-V has a higher load carrying capacity than a 2019 RAM 1500 Limited Crew Cab.
 
WTH?? 4470 pounds? Is the AWD system made out of granite? A stock CT6 is LIGHTER than a stock CTS. How did the CT6-V gain so much weight?
I see a C&D review of a 2016 AWD CT6 Premium as having weighed the car at 4371 lbs. 3rd gen Vs are pretty light on the Alpha platform. C&D has a 3rd gen V's weight listed at 4129 lbs, which is significantly lighter than the 2nd gen -V; is that perhaps what you were thinking of?

GeeXXXPee.
Truth. :( I miss that car. It was manual too.
 
Keep in mind the CT6V is not the next gen V4.

CT5-V is the CTSV 3 next gen.

The CT6V is its own vehicle and more like the V sport variant.
I was able to see the car tonight at the Detroit Auto Show. It looked more like a V Sport. I was very disappointed, not very aggressive looking, plain...online photos look better. There is no way this is a V4 so I hope your right
 
81 - 100 of 250 Posts