Joined
·
17,906 Posts
Final update 09/05/15: myth busted (IMHO). A 20* drop in surface temperatures at the base of the supercharger appears to have no tangible effects in lowering IAT2 (see post #3)
--------------------------------------------------
Background:
Per the manufacturer:
-----------------------------------------------------
Methods:
The test Circuit is 13.3 total miles. Cold start in AM, normal driving (little to no boost) to RB Road, allowing for full warm-up. 3rd gear pull from 2500 RPM to 6400 RPM (~35-100mph), then normal driving to interstate for another ~3miles of driving at 70mph. Logging will end at that point.
How I routed my intercooler system: BMR reservoir + removal of factory hard lines in the following fashion (I already have a Track Attack heat exchanger, ZL1 lid and Varimax pump):
Remember that I am also using 50/50 dexcool with 1/2 bottle of water wetter. Those of you running only distilled water or water with Water Wetter will likely experience lower IAT2's and possibly faster recovery times under similar situations. Also, the routing of my coolant system may potentially skew my findings, but that is also debatable!
The vendor states they have IAT2 data for the larger spacers, which I have not yet seen publicly posted. If anyone has a link to their testing, I would love to compare my methodology to theirs.
I am using the thinner 3/16" phenolic spacers (with mylar cover) designed to fit under a stock hood, which will likely contribute to less than ideal heat management. The vendor states that you will have to lower the cradle to use these if you also have a ZL1 lid - however I did not need to do this (my lid is milled), and installation was relatively straight forward.
** I Recommend you replace your blower-to-cylinder head bolts after every S/C removal! We managed to snap one after the second blower swap...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time for data (aka RESULTS):
ETA: Updated 08/31/2015:
I plotted a baseline run with my BMR reservoir tank from last month vs a run today: each run was made on the same route I've used for all of my cooling system testing, with each run occurring roughly 10 minutes in from cold-start (the car is warmed up at this point; ECT's hit 190 within 4 minutes of cold-start on all runs). The baseline / first run's ambient tempurature was 80* as read on the NAV screen, the comparison run this morning with spacers had an advantage with lower ambient temps of 75*:
IAT2 Cruising temperatures were not plotted (sorry, Evil_V); however my data shows no improvement in steady-state highway cruising @ 70mph vs previous baselines: With the BMR reservoir alone and with the reservoir with Phenolic spacers, I record 16-17* over ambient temperature in 75+ degree weather. I did notice a 1-3* drop in IAT2 when I added the BMR reservoir and 3/4" lines over stock lines and orientation under similar conditions.
ETA 09/01/2015: Second comparison based on ambient temps and starting IAT2:
** Higher or lower cruising speeds, even resulting in a few hundred RPM difference, will cause equally variable IAT2 in my experience. The conditions and environment in which you choose to test will greatly influence your outcomes! I do also have IAT1 data but don't use it due to the tendency of the MAF sensor to heat soak and skew data.
Commentary:
Preliminary data is rather suggestive in that the spacers seem to actually be trapping heat in the blower during WOT pulls, as some have feared (Comparison 1). This makes sense since the bulk of heat production is from the blower (and not the cylinder heads) in that scenario. Engine coolant temps reach 190+ in my vehicle typically within four minutes of driving (70+ ambient); this may explain why the blower appears to already be heat-soaked at the beginning the first data set in spite of lower ambient temperatures. With ambient conditions of approximately 80*F with ~10 minute warm ups and back-road driving averaging around 40mph, IMHO this should have been the ideal scenario for these spacers to shine (clearly, they did not).
Comparison 2 shows identical IAT1 and IAT2 starting conditions, although ambient was marginally cooler by 3*F in the baseline and that was reflected in the driving warm-up IAT readings early on. Here, IAT2 essentially mirrors itself in either run - thankfully showing no "heat soak" but remember that ambiet baseline run is ~10 degrees cooler in this comparison, again with very short drive times prior to the runs!
As for dyno runs and heat soak - that may be a different issue; but we all know glory runs on the dyno are kryptonite for being taken seriously around here.
Disclaimer:
* PSA: This is my own data - your mileage may vary. Every attempt at unbiased comparison has been made as best I can do it, afford it, and plan it out. If you don't like it, no problem. If you did your own testing, and had fantastic results - please share! If you want to degrade my efforts because your "horse" didn't come out on top, then go fuck yourself.
* IAT2 is NOT the same thing as blower casing or lid surface temperatures!
* More runs will be completed over the next few weeks to rule out anomalous data points, and for averaging to account for changing temps.
* These are two single WOT-run comparisons baseline ambient was 80* vs the spacers run with 75* ambient. Again, same route was taken in each case, with each run roughly at the 10 minute mark from my datalogs. If this trend holds up, it appears as though there will be no benefit from the phenolic spacers if full heat soak of the blower occurs within 10 minutes of engine warm up.
* see post #3 for a detailed IAT2 comparison of two driving logs for my final, definitive comparison.
--------------------------------------------------
Background:
Per the manufacturer:
With the Thermal reduction plates the blower will operate significantly cooler and make it perform as if were in cooler weather consistently... Higher Case temps create higher IATs, Higher IATs reduce spark advance and lead to spark Knock
Ideally, I will be able to confirm results similar to those claimed, as I have a daily driver that sees stop-n-go traffic mixed with 25+ miles of interstate driving and I often see IAT2s creep up while waiting to enjoy that next on-ramp.The CTS-V temperatures recorded were 125-185 Deg F and they were reduced 25-50 deg F... Smokey Yuniks rule of thumb was there is a 1% gain of power for every 10 degrees of lower air temperatures. You are therefore looking at a 3-5% power gain. If you are making around 570rwhp that is a 18-28.5 rwhp gain
-----------------------------------------------------
Methods:
The test Circuit is 13.3 total miles. Cold start in AM, normal driving (little to no boost) to RB Road, allowing for full warm-up. 3rd gear pull from 2500 RPM to 6400 RPM (~35-100mph), then normal driving to interstate for another ~3miles of driving at 70mph. Logging will end at that point.
How I routed my intercooler system: BMR reservoir + removal of factory hard lines in the following fashion (I already have a Track Attack heat exchanger, ZL1 lid and Varimax pump):

Remember that I am also using 50/50 dexcool with 1/2 bottle of water wetter. Those of you running only distilled water or water with Water Wetter will likely experience lower IAT2's and possibly faster recovery times under similar situations. Also, the routing of my coolant system may potentially skew my findings, but that is also debatable!
The vendor states they have IAT2 data for the larger spacers, which I have not yet seen publicly posted. If anyone has a link to their testing, I would love to compare my methodology to theirs.
I am using the thinner 3/16" phenolic spacers (with mylar cover) designed to fit under a stock hood, which will likely contribute to less than ideal heat management. The vendor states that you will have to lower the cradle to use these if you also have a ZL1 lid - however I did not need to do this (my lid is milled), and installation was relatively straight forward.
** I Recommend you replace your blower-to-cylinder head bolts after every S/C removal! We managed to snap one after the second blower swap...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time for data (aka RESULTS):
ETA: Updated 08/31/2015:
I plotted a baseline run with my BMR reservoir tank from last month vs a run today: each run was made on the same route I've used for all of my cooling system testing, with each run occurring roughly 10 minutes in from cold-start (the car is warmed up at this point; ECT's hit 190 within 4 minutes of cold-start on all runs). The baseline / first run's ambient tempurature was 80* as read on the NAV screen, the comparison run this morning with spacers had an advantage with lower ambient temps of 75*:

IAT2 Cruising temperatures were not plotted (sorry, Evil_V); however my data shows no improvement in steady-state highway cruising @ 70mph vs previous baselines: With the BMR reservoir alone and with the reservoir with Phenolic spacers, I record 16-17* over ambient temperature in 75+ degree weather. I did notice a 1-3* drop in IAT2 when I added the BMR reservoir and 3/4" lines over stock lines and orientation under similar conditions.
ETA 09/01/2015: Second comparison based on ambient temps and starting IAT2:

** Higher or lower cruising speeds, even resulting in a few hundred RPM difference, will cause equally variable IAT2 in my experience. The conditions and environment in which you choose to test will greatly influence your outcomes! I do also have IAT1 data but don't use it due to the tendency of the MAF sensor to heat soak and skew data.
Commentary:
Preliminary data is rather suggestive in that the spacers seem to actually be trapping heat in the blower during WOT pulls, as some have feared (Comparison 1). This makes sense since the bulk of heat production is from the blower (and not the cylinder heads) in that scenario. Engine coolant temps reach 190+ in my vehicle typically within four minutes of driving (70+ ambient); this may explain why the blower appears to already be heat-soaked at the beginning the first data set in spite of lower ambient temperatures. With ambient conditions of approximately 80*F with ~10 minute warm ups and back-road driving averaging around 40mph, IMHO this should have been the ideal scenario for these spacers to shine (clearly, they did not).
Comparison 2 shows identical IAT1 and IAT2 starting conditions, although ambient was marginally cooler by 3*F in the baseline and that was reflected in the driving warm-up IAT readings early on. Here, IAT2 essentially mirrors itself in either run - thankfully showing no "heat soak" but remember that ambiet baseline run is ~10 degrees cooler in this comparison, again with very short drive times prior to the runs!
As for dyno runs and heat soak - that may be a different issue; but we all know glory runs on the dyno are kryptonite for being taken seriously around here.
Disclaimer:
* PSA: This is my own data - your mileage may vary. Every attempt at unbiased comparison has been made as best I can do it, afford it, and plan it out. If you don't like it, no problem. If you did your own testing, and had fantastic results - please share! If you want to degrade my efforts because your "horse" didn't come out on top, then go fuck yourself.
* IAT2 is NOT the same thing as blower casing or lid surface temperatures!
* More runs will be completed over the next few weeks to rule out anomalous data points, and for averaging to account for changing temps.
* These are two single WOT-run comparisons baseline ambient was 80* vs the spacers run with 75* ambient. Again, same route was taken in each case, with each run roughly at the 10 minute mark from my datalogs. If this trend holds up, it appears as though there will be no benefit from the phenolic spacers if full heat soak of the blower occurs within 10 minutes of engine warm up.
* see post #3 for a detailed IAT2 comparison of two driving logs for my final, definitive comparison.