Cadillac CTS-V Forum banner
1 - 20 of 27 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
459 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Is any one using the after market baffles for our cars? If so does it help a lot?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
459 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
I have an Improved Racing, but not sure if it makes a difference or not
Yeah I'm going to have the engine out so I was thinking about doing it while it's able to be done.

But I'm not sure if it's worth it or not.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,648 Posts
I have one. I didn’t have issues with the stock baffle so it’s hard to tell if it helped. It certainly hasn’t hurt.
 

· Premium Member
Fun pedal, Few doors
Joined
·
4,048 Posts
I have one. I didn’t have issues with the stock baffle so it’s hard to tell if it helped. It certainly hasn’t hurt.
Just curious...you've spent a lot of time at the track; have you logged oil pressure data with a stock set up? Supposedly the stock design allows momentary oil starvation at launch...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,648 Posts
I datalog every pass. I've cut as low as 1.42 60' and never saw any oil pressure drop, stock pan w/ 7 quarts of oil. I expect the new motor to go 1.3x once I get some things figured out in the tune. That's why I did the baffle. I think some of the faster cars started having issues in the 1.3x range. The baffle helped a little, but most ended up going with an $800 moroso copo camaro pan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrSurly

· Registered
Joined
·
1,648 Posts
With a manual trans/clutch, you aren't very likely to go 1.3x 60'. It's possible, but extremely difficult at full weight with stock suspension. So if I were you, I'd just put an improved racing baffle in the stock pan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrSurly

· Registered
Joined
·
459 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
You think this will work good for road racing?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,648 Posts
That's the intended purpose for the improved racing baffle. It has a sump with trap doors on 3 sides iirc (front and each side), so it can handle side to side g's and hard braking and keep oil at the pickup.

If you're still running a stock bottom end with LSA oil squirters, most of your oil will stay in the bottom of the motor anyway. The bigger problem comes with HV pumps that pump all the oil to the top of the heads and the drainback is less than the motor consumes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rubber Duck

· Registered
Joined
·
459 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
That's the intended purpose for the improved racing baffle. It has a sump with trap doors on 3 sides iirc (front and each side), so it can handle side to side g's and hard braking and keep oil at the pickup.

If you're still running a stock bottom end with LSA oil squirters, most of your oil will stay in the bottom of the motor anyway. The bigger problem comes with HV pumps that pump all the oil to the top of the heads and the drainback is less than the motor consumes.
Yes I have stock bottom end, full bolt ons.

So do I need to worry about this with stock bottom end?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,648 Posts
I don’t know I’ve never road raced my car. Try it stock and see.
 

· Premium Member
2011 CTSV Coupe M BLK LSX376-B15
Joined
·
1,232 Posts
I have the improved racing baffle installed with stock pan, I don't have any prior logs to compare, with that said, I have not logged any pressure drops due to not having the baffle. However, in my particular setup I do have slight drop in oil pressure at WOT high mph rpms due to lower flow than optimal oil pump that I plan to change out come next engine rebuild time. The baffle decision for me came down to added insurance.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
459 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
I have the improved racing baffle installed with stock pan, I don't have any prior logs to compare, with that said, I have not logged any pressure drops due to not having the baffle. However, in my particular setup I do have slight drop in oil pressure at WOT high mph rpms due to lower flow than optimal oil pump that I plan to change out come next engine rebuild time. The baffle decision for me came down to added insurance.
Do you mean upgraded oil pump? Isn't the problem that the lsa has to high of output ?
 

· Premium Member
2011 CTSV Coupe M BLK LSX376-B15
Joined
·
1,232 Posts
Do you mean upgraded oil pump? Isn't the problem that the lsa has to high of output ?
The LSA PN: 12612289 oil pump would be a good replacement to the stock PN: 12586665 oil pump my LSX376-B15 long block was delivered with. The higher pressure/flow LSA pump accommodates the LSA oil squirters that cool the thin cylinder sleeves. My LSX376-B15 engine has very thick cylinder sleeves, no squirters, and could benefit having the extra 30% flow and pressure common to the LSA pump based on my data logs.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
459 Posts
Discussion Starter · #19 ·
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top