I mean I wouldn’t feel great about that much glitter in my oil so I’m kind of surprised blackstone says it’s all good. I’m sure guys with more experience will chime in but my first thought is I’d be concerned about bearings.
That I don’t know. The bucket in the picture was from my garage and it was not clean but that glittery oil was directly from the filter.Did the shop use a clean drain pan?
Well that’s more clear. I was questioning the oil perhaps being contaminated externally.That I don’t know. The bucket in the picture was from my garage and it was not clean but that glittery oil was directly from the filter.
That was a ton of help! I greatly appreciate that input.The oil does indeed look kind of scary. The chemical analysis doesn't seem to match. I think this is an artifact of the method they use to test samples, "Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry" (ICP-MS). Basically, they use a super-heated plasma (much hotter than a chemical fire could generate) to atomize a sample, and then they analyze that gas. At least with the ICP I'm familiar with, the sample has to be injected as a mist. So the sample has to be filtered for particulate before going in to the machine. So they'll detect truly "dissolved" metals (nano sized particles) but not big chunks. A bearing that wears out and fails will produce lots of nano particulate on the way to wearing out, that would be seen in an analysis like ICP. But if a bearing suddenly started to disintegrate, breaking up in to visible-to-the-eye sized pieces, ICP might not be capable of seeing that contamination.
It doesn't look like Blackstone does a "particle count" analysis, which I'd argue they really should since that would capture both the quantities and sizes of any particulate suspended in the oil but too large to get through the ICP's sample filter.
What part of the report would reflect that? Insolubles?I have maintained regular reports. Based on the image you posted, a report would reflect high metal ppm. The report you posted does not match the image sample.